Tag Archives: lawsuit

Samsung: Apple-requested injunction would ‘confuse and intimidate’ customers

Samsung has a new legal argument in its ongoing litigation with Apple over the sale of certain Android-based smartphones in the US. While the basis of Apple's case is patent infringement claims, Samsung is now arguing that allowing Apple a permanent injunction would "intimidate and confuse" customers.

The drive of Samsung's case, according to an examination by FOSS Patents, is that the injunction "would not stop any ongoing infringement, for Samsung has either discontinued the accused products or designed around any infringing features in ones that it still sells."

Apple won a massive US$1.05 billion award for damages in the case this past August, however at the end of April it was announced the companies would be returning to court to renegotiate the amount due to jury errors when calculating damages. A new trial has been set for November 12 to determine the new award for Apple.

Samsung is arguing that allowing the injunction to go through would create confusion in the market place for retailers and consumers, leading to a belief that non-infringing products were covered as well. The move cites Apple's actions last year when they sent letters to retailers warning them about the injunction, even though a majority of the products listed in the injunction were no longer for sale, or had been updated to work around the patents.

As of press time Apple has not commented on Samsung's filing.

You can read FOSS Patents full run down here.

Samsung: Apple-requested injunction would 'confuse and intimidate' customers originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Fri, 03 May 2013 15:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source

Apple changes its position on iOS VPN changes

Earlier this month, Apple posted a support document on its website with details on how settings would change for iOS users connecting to virtual private networks (VPNs). Now the company has done an about-face, updating the document to inform the public that the changes will not happen.

The changes were made following a patent infringement lawsuit by VirnetX against Apple in which Apple was found to have violated a patent through the design of the popular FaceTime software. That loss in court cost Apple US$368 million, and the company made a minor change in the iOS VPN On Demand feature as a result. As Jacqui Cheng of Ars Technica explains, "The change was going to be relatively minor-devices with VPN On Demand configured to 'always' would instead behave as if they were set up to only establish a connection as needed."

The latest document from Apple appears to indicate that it has come to an agreement with VirnetX and won't need to issue a software update to make the VPN changes. The document states that "Apple no longer plans to change the behavior of the VPN On Demand feature of iOS 6.1 for devices that have already been shipped. The 'Always' option will continue to work as it currently does on these devices."

Apple changes its position on iOS VPN changes originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source

Apple to pay Chinese authors $118,000 for violating copyrights

As reported by China Daily, a Beijing court has ordered Apple to pay three Chinese authors US$118,000 in damages for selling their books without prior consent through apps available on its App Store.

The lawsuit was filed against Apple by the Writers' Right Protection Union (also known as the Writers' Rights Alliance), an organization that protects the copyrights of authors whose works are published online.

According to China Daily, Judge Feng Gang, who was presiding over the case, said Apple "has the duty of checking whether books uploaded by third parties are in line with current laws."

The ruling follows a long line of complaints and lawsuits against Apple by Chinese authors who claim their works have been uploaded through apps to Apple's App Store without their permission.

[Via Engadget]

Apple to pay Chinese authors $118,000 for violating copyrights originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source

Judge Accuses Apple, Google of Using Court System for Business Strategy

Apple Vs. GoogleApple has been getting into hot water lately with various patent infringement judges. In February, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh told Apple and Samsung to streamline their claims to 25 total. She called the overwhelming list of claims presented to the court “cruel and unusual punishment.” Now, a Florida court judge is accusing Apple and Google of misusing the court system to sue each other as a business strategy “that appears to have no end.”

According to Bloomberg, U.S. District Judge Robert Scola gave the parties involved four months to narrow their claims against each other. If they are unable to comply, he said he will put the case on hold.

The Florida case involves more than 180 infringement claims related to 12 patents, as well as disputes of the meaning of more than 100 terms. Scola ordered Google and Apple to streamline their case, calling their actions, “obstreperous and cantankerous conduct.”

The Judge went on to say that the parties involved are asking the court to “mop up the mess” they made by asking for a hearing to reduce the size of the case. “The court declines this invitation,” Scola said.

If Apple doesn’t watch out, more judges are going to jump on this bandwagon and may start throwing out patent infringement suits on the basis that the U.S. Courts don’t want to be the funnel through which Apple removes competition from the market.

» Related posts: Apple, Samsung Ordered to Pare Down Lawsuit Claims by Federal Judge ITC Judge Hints at Possibly Favoring Apple in Patent Case Against Samsung Japanese Court Finds Samsung Products don’t Infringe on Apple Patents

iTunes Tweak Adds Age Rating to App Pages

App Rating

When you went to your iPad’s App Store this morning, you may have noticed a small, but important change to the way it looks. Late last night, Apple made a tweak to its App Store design that adds age rating tags to every app. Maybe now parents will be able to distinguish much easier which apps are appropriate for their little ones to play.

Apple has gotten into a lot of hot water over age ratings in the past year. A few months ago, Apple made the Twitter-owned video app, Vine, an Editor’s Choice for the iPhone. Unbeknownst to Apple, as well as the unassuming users who downloaded the app, in its early stages, pornography was remarkably easy to find through Vine.

Shortly thereafter, Apple removed the popular photography app 500PX from the App Store because users were able to track down nude photos if they tried hard enough. Today, both apps have a 17+ rating, making it very easy for App Store browsers to know whether they should let their seven-year-old have access to it.

In February, Apple settled a multimillion-dollar class-action lawsuit over in-app purchases that kids had made without their parent’s knowledge. Only a week ago, Apple added a tag line under certain apps that reads “Offers In-App Purchases.”

App Store Rating 2

Thanks to a very heavy campaign against Apple for not making it harder to spend money and easier to tell what is age appropriate, these changes are being implemented.

Incidentally, Apple has always included the age rating for each app in the App Store. However, it used to only be under the Information section. Apple has just added an easier-to-spot tag to the top of the app for those consumers who don’t want to actually use their brains and read something in order to figure out whether their kids should play with an app or not.

[Via: Apple Insider]

» Related posts: Apple Releases iOS Updates for Pages, Numbers, and Keynote iPad Runs Apps in Separate Windows with New Jailbreak Tweak Google Takes a Page from Apple – Adds Game Center Feature to Android App Store

Hearing aid maker sues Apple over EarPods, alleges trademark infringement

Hearing Aid company sues Apple over EarPods, alleges trademark infringement

Late last week, Apple was hit with a trademark infringement lawsuit courtesy of Randolph Divisions, a company that manufactures digital hearing aids. The Next Web reports that the suit, which was filed in Hawaii, alleges that Apple's EarPods headphones infringe upon their own "HearPod" trademark and product.

Apple's EarPods were originally released alongside the iPhone 5 this past September. They were touted as offering better sound quality and more comfort than previous Apple headphones which, while iconic, weren't exactly best in class audio-wise.

It's worth noting that Randolph Divisions has owned the "HearPod" trademark since 2007, though Apple itself does hold US trademarks for both "EarPods" and "Apple EarPods."

So does Randolph Divisions have a case here? It sure doesn't seem like it.

Under trademark law, the standard for infringement is whether or not two products are so similar as to cause a "likelihood of confusion" amongst consumers.

In deciding whether two products with similar marks might result in customer confusion, a court may look at a number of factors, including how well-known a particular trademark is, how similar the two marks in question are (do they look similar, do they sound similar), the intent of the defendant and any evidence of actual customer confusion in the marketplace.

In this particular case, it's a struggle to find an inkling of how customer confusion could exist.

Randolph Divisions' HearPod hearing aids are in a completely different product category than Apple's EarPods. Furthermore, it seems hard, if not impossible, to imagine any consumer looking for hearing aids and mistakenly picking up a pair of Apple's white EarPods instead.

It's also worth noting that the courts will sometimes look at how expensive or unique a product is when making a determination regarding the likelihood of customer confusion.

For instance, when a product is particularly expensive or unique, customers are likely to be more informed of their purchase decisions and consequently less prone to confusion. To that end, hearing aids are as unique a product as any and it stands to reason that someone in the market for hearing aids certainly knows the difference between that and headphones.

Nonetheless, the complaint attempts to paint both products as being similar in nature.

It reads in part:

Both Plaintiffs' Goods and Defendant's Goods are similar in nature in that, among other things, they are inserted into the ears of their users and are used to facilitate and enhance the transmission of sounds to the users.

That's a stretch, to say the least.

Randolph Divisions is also alleging infringement via trademark dilution. Here, again, the company runs into trouble as dilution is typically found when a company's trademark is either associated with an unseemly product (i.e. cigarettes) or is used on a product which blurs the distinctiveness of the original trademark.

I would surmise that Randolph Divisons' only leg to stand on is the fact that the earpod.com domain name redirects to myhearpod.com, a domain owned and operated by Randolph Divisions. That, however, suggests that folks looking for the Apple headphones are more likely to be affected by product confusion than those looking for hearing aids.

Randolph Divisions is asking for damages along with an order preventing Apple from selling its EarPods. Based on the above, I doubt this case will go anywhere, but it's certainly interesting to see Apple on the opposite side of a pod-centric legal dispute.

Apple has historically been rather aggressive in protecting its Pod trademark. For instance, Apple opposed Sector Labs' plan to introduce a video projector called "Video Pod." The case ultimately went to trial with the US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ruling that Apple's 'Pod' trademark was famous and therefore warranted broad protection under the law.

Hearing aid maker sues Apple over EarPods, alleges trademark infringement originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:15:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source

Daily Update for March 18, 2013

It's the TUAW Daily Update, your source for Apple news in a convenient audio format. You'll get all the top Apple stories of the day in three to five minutes for a quick review of what's happening in the Apple world.

You can listen to today's Apple stories by clicking the inline player (requires Flash) or the non-Flash link below. To subscribe to the podcast for daily listening through iTunes, click here.

No Flash? Click here to listen.

Subscribe via RSS

Daily Update for March 18, 2013 originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:45:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source

THX sues Apple for speaker designs found in iDevices and iMacs

THX has filed a lawsuit against Apple alleging the computer maker has infringed on its speaker designs. As Bloomberg reports, THX holds a patent that was granted in 2008 that covers narrow-profile speaker designs in consumer electronics and their ability to boost sound output. The technology is used in the iPhone 4S, the iPhone 5, some models of the iPad and some iMacs.

THX alleges that Apple's use of the patented technology is causing the company "monetary damage and irreparable harm." It is seeking an order from the court to instruct Apple to stop using the technology and to pay the company reasonable royalties and damages. Readers can see the speaker design in the new iMac (above) that THX alleges infringes on its patent.

THX sues Apple for speaker designs found in iDevices and iMacs originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source

Daily Update for March 15, 2013

It's the TUAW Daily Update, your source for Apple news in a convenient audio format. You'll get all the top Apple stories of the day in three to five minutes for a quick review of what's happening in the Apple world.

You can listen to today's Apple stories by clicking the inline player (requires Flash) or the non-Flash link below. To subscribe to the podcast for daily listening through iTunes, click here.

No Flash? Click here to listen.

Subscribe via RSS

Daily Update for March 15, 2013 originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Fri, 15 Mar 2013 23:45:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source

Jobs biographer Walter Isaacson needn’t testify in e-book case

Steve Jobs' biographer Walter Isaacson has been dropped from the upcoming Apple e-books price-fixing case, according to Paid Content. Class-action lawyers had originally subpoenaed Isaacson to submit his notes from interviews with Jobs regarding the iBookstore. However, Isaacson refused to do so, noting a New York law that allows a journalist to shield their sources. But new court documents filed last week reveal both parties have agreed to drop Isaacson -- and his notes -- from the case.

The lawsuit alleges Apple -- and Jobs in particular -- colluded with publishers to inflate e-book prices. In September of last year Apple agreed to stop e-book price fixing in Europe. The e-book price fixing case in the US commences June 3.

Jobs biographer Walter Isaacson needn't testify in e-book case originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Wed, 06 Mar 2013 11:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source

Judge Koh reduces damages in Apple v. Samsung case by $450 million, orders new trial

There's been a significant development in the court case that saw Apple awarded US$1.05 billion in damages last August. According to The Recorder, Judge Lucy Koh has ordered that the amount Samsung must pay Apple be reduced by $450 million, or almost 40 percent, and that a new trial be held to decide how much of that amount will still be paid.

There's evidently been some question regarding 14 of the Samsung devices covered by the lawsuit and exactly how much of the damages originally awarded to Apple can be attributed to them. This new trial will look more closely at the specific intellectual properties these devices are violating and could possibly result in the damages being reduced or increased based on the findings. A new jury will need to be selected before the trial can take place.

FOSS Patents reports that the devices in question include several smartphones from the Galaxy line, the Galaxy Tab and the Nexus S 4G.

[Via Apple Insider]

Judge Koh reduces damages in Apple v. Samsung case by $450 million, orders new trial originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Fri, 01 Mar 2013 17:15:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source

David Einhorn drops his lawsuit against Apple

Greenlight Capital hedge fund manager David Einhorn has decided to end what Apple CEO Tim Cook has referred to as a "silly sideshow" by dropping the lawsuit he'd brought against 1 Infinite Loop in early February. Filed in conjunction with other Apple shareholders, the lawsuit sought to force Apple to share more of its cash with investors and kill a vote by shareholders involving preferred shares.

Einhorn and company had been awarded a victory by a federal judge last week who intervened and forced Apple to postpone the vote in question. Seemingly content with the fact that the vote had been blocked by the court, Einhorn and Greenlight have dropped the suit entirely, telling AllThingsD, "Apple removed the bundled proposal from the shareholder meeting, therefore resolving the issue." One legal matter for Apple down, countless others to go.

David Einhorn drops his lawsuit against Apple originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source

Greenlight Drops Lawsuit Against Apple, Says Issue is Resolved

Einhorn, president of Greenlight Capital, speaks during the Sohn Investment Conference in New YorkIn the first week of February, Greenlight Capital hedge fund analyst David Einhorn filed a lawsuit against Apple over a preferred stock option, which would give back some of the company’s huge cash pile to investors.

The next day, Apple issued an official press release saying that the company is exploring cash return options and would be taking Greenlight’s proposal into consideration. Last week, Apple pulled a proposal from its charter that would have allowed shareholders to eliminate preferred stock. Today, Greenlight dropped the lawsuit.

Greenlight Capital owns $585 million in Apple stock and Einhorn alone holds 1.3 million shares, so what the company does with its money is important to the investor.

When a New York federal judge blocked Apple from voting on the preferred stock because the iPad maker had bundled the proposal into another un-related proposal regarding staggered voting for directors. Judge Richard Sullivan claimed that this type of action is a violation of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s “unbundling rules,” [Via: Forbes]

Apple pulled the “blank check” preferred stock proposal from the voting proxy, which was enough to satisfy Greenlight. A spokesperson for the investment firm told AllThingsD that the suit had served its purpose. “Apple removed the bundled proposal from the shareholder meeting, therefore resolving the issue.” The end.

» Related posts: Apple Issues Public Statement on Returning Cash to Shareholders, Stock Rises Hedge Fund Manager Sues Apple For Bigger Share Of Huge Cash Pile Apple Gives $2.5 Billion Valentine’s Day Treat to Shareholders

Apple: iPhone tracking lawsuit doesn’t demonstrate harm

Remember when a group of plaintiffs decided to sue Apple, alleging that the company was allowing free apps from the App Store to gather geographical location information without their consent? Well, Bloomberg reports that Apple was in US District Court in California on Wednesday, asking Judge Lucy Koh to deny a request from plaintiffs' counsel to have the case turned into a class-action suit.

Apple says that the plaintiffs haven't proven that any tracking that did take place actually resulted in harm to them. The lawyers for the plaintiffs have also dropped their claims to damages, which Apple views as proof that they're only trying for class-action status in order to recover legal fees.

The lawsuit revolved around the ability of apps to have access to an iOS device's unique device identifier (UDID), allowing ad agencies to capture usage data across apps. Apple now restricts UDID access by app and is actually rejecting some apps that still use the code.

[via Apple Insider]

Apple: iPhone tracking lawsuit doesn't demonstrate harm originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Fri, 01 Mar 2013 14:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source

Apple ordered to pay VirnetX $363K daily in patent dispute

Here's one way to force two warring companies to hash things out. A federal judge has ordered Apple to cough up more than US$360,000 daily to VirnetX until the two can come to an agreement on the former licensing four of the latter's patents.

The penalties stem from a verdict delivered in November of 2012 which found that Apple's FaceTime and iMessage infringed on four of VirnetX's patents. A jury in Texas awarded VirnetX $368.2 million in damages, and Apple can still appeal that verdict.

US Circuit Judge Leonard Davis has ordered Apple to pay $330,000 in damages and $33,000 in interest to VirnetX daily for the next 45 days, or more than $16 million in total, in an effort to get the two companies to the bargaining table. Additionally, Davis is making the companies meet with a mediator in an effort to help them reach a licensing deal.

If a deal can't be ironed out before the 45-day period ends, VirnetX will be able to seek a sales ban on devices it believes are in violation of its patents, which originally included the iPhone 4 and first-generation iPad.

Apple ordered to pay VirnetX $363K daily in patent dispute originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source

Apple reaches settlement with parents over in-app purchases

Parents whose children purchased in-app items for real money without them knowing are going to receive compensation from Apple. As reported by GigaOM, the company has reached a settlement today in a class action lawsuit filed against it in 2011, and will issue a US$5 iTunes gift card to those who make a claim. If the claim is for more than $5, Apple will add a credit to the person's account, while claims over $30 will be paid in cash.

The suit was originally brought against Apple by a Pennsylvania man named Garen Meguerian, whose daughter racked up more than $200 in in-app purchases without his knowledge. For its part, Apple sought to limit such purchases by requiring an account password to be entered for each IAP. In the suit, Meguerian suggested that a second, different password be required for IAPs.

Under the proposed settlement, those seeking to receive payment from Apple will have their iTunes purchase histories reviewed to ensure that the purchases were actually made, and must attest that their children made the purchases without their knowledge and without being given the account password. The settlement is currently awaiting approval by a federal judge.

[Via Apple Insider]

Apple reaches settlement with parents over in-app purchases originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source

Apple, Samsung case in Australia warrants two-judge system

Samsung and Apple have been battling in the Australian court system for almost two years. According to a report in Financial Review, the infringement claims have gotten so complicated that the court system has taken a radical move to simplify the hearings.

For the first time in Federal Court history, two judges will be present in court to hear each side's arguments. The idea was introduced by Justice Annabelle Bennett, who has been involved in the court cases since the beginning. Joining her in court will be Justice David Yates. The pair will have to examine 19 patent infringement claims by Apple and several from Samsung.

[Via AppleInsider]

Apple, Samsung case in Australia warrants two-judge system originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source

Apple cancels shareholder vote after judge sides with Greenlight’s Einhorn

Greenlight Capital hedge fund manager David Einhorn has scored a legal victory against Apple in the lawsuit he and shareholders filed against 1 Infinite Loop earlier this month. Reuters is reporting that US District Judge Richard Sullivan has sided with Einhorn and ordered Apple to postpone voting on a contested measure during a shareholder meeting scheduled for February 27. In a statement, Greenlight called the ruling "a significant win for all Apple shareholders and for good corporate governance."

Called Proposal 2, the measure would, if approved, require a shareholder vote before the Cupertino company could issue preferred stocks. Einhorn is opposed to the measure and has instead proposed "iPrefs," a form of preferred stock and perpetual divided.

In the wake of the decision, Apple has formally removed a vote on Proposal 2 from next week's meeting agenda. The measure had been paired with two other unrelated proposals -- both of which Einhorn agrees with -- in a proxy vote. Einhorn contends that combining the items amounts to "bundling," a practice which violates Securities and Exchange Commission rules.

While Einhorn and company are obviously pleased with the court's decision, Reuters reports that other Apple shareholders, including pension fund CalPers, are not so happy. Einhorn's end goal is to see the matter of preferred stock issuance unbundled from Proposal 2, but Apple has so far given no indication that it intends to willingly cave to these demands.

[Via AppleInsider]

Apple cancels shareholder vote after judge sides with Greenlight's Einhorn originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Fri, 22 Feb 2013 22:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source

German court issues stay in Samsung’s VoiceOver suit against Apple

Hello there, it's Friday and time for your regularly scheduled update on the continuing courtroom hijinks between Samsung and Apple! Today we bring word via FOSS Patents that a German court has stayed one of the approximately 200 million cases (give or take a few) brought by the former against the latter. This one involves a Samsung patent covering the translation on onscreen text to voice, or, as Apple terms it, VoiceOver.

Judge Andreas Voss of the Mannheim Regional Court is putting the brakes on the case, citing the fact that the patent in question is currently having its validity examined by a different German court. In fact, Samsung has already had to narrow down its claims against Apple vis-

Judge believes Greenlight Capital has a strong case against Apple

Earlier this month, David Einhorn of hedge fund Greenlight Capital and Apple shareholders brought a lawsuit against Apple seeking to force the company to share more of its massive cash reserves with shareholders, and claiming that it had violated SEC rules in a proposed amendent to its corporate charter. Yesterday in New York, US District Judge Richard Sullivan, who's hearing the case, said that the "likelihood of success is in favor for Greenlight on the merits," according to a report by Fortune.

Einhorn is seeking to block a vote on the proposition that Apple intends to conduct during its next shareholder meeting on February 27. Judge Sullivan stated that he wasn't entirely convinced that Greenlight would suffer "irreparable harm" if the vote goes through, and is inclined to let it happen since the results could be undone if he later finds that Apple violated SEC rules. Einhorn actually supports two of the three items in the proposition, but strongly opposes the third, which would let Apple issue preferred shares without a shareholder vote.

Judge Sullivan said that he will issue a ruling on Einhorn's request to block the shareholders from voting before they gather next Wednesday. It's seeming likely that Sullivan -- who called the situation "a mess" -- will simply wait to see what the shareholders decide before taking further action. For his part, Apple CEO Tim Cook is calling the hole thing a "silly sideshow."

Judge believes Greenlight Capital has a strong case against Apple originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Source